Egnyte local cloud1/22/2024 ![]() ![]() I had a user ask me the other day about their old personal phone may be hacked. Can a phone be compromised from text message Security.So seriously looking at what you have suggested. Today I got reply from Nasuni, as you said they do not have anything address my road warriors. At the same time, I need a mirror copy of all these files locally at each office as I do not want to measure the patience of my gigabit LAN users by telling them to download files from the cloud. Since my problem is poor interconnectivity between offices, I really need to move my file server to a central location where everyone accesses it seamlessly without any bandwidth bottlenecks. In this situation, changed files from the offline sync. Again, locking is not applied to offline files if they are locked on the cloud, after the files are taken offline. For example, as I had mentioned earlier, files/folders changed at both ends, especially from an offline sync. This means Internet connectivity is a must and the user has to work either directly from the browser or through a mapped network drive to maintain data integrity. However, all these work well as long as you are not taking the files offline (similar to Sync. Integration with Google Docs (eventhough we do not really require it) Integration with existing LDAP server for managing user accounts (with additional cost) and future enterprise level expansion possibilities Real version control and a good reporting on file usageįiles can be shared with 3’rd parties by sending a link and username/password (link expiry can be specified)īetter and easier user interface for file browsing issues while sync.ing to case-insensitive windows machines) Not case sensitive (JD uses a case sensitive online storage and creates a lot of sync. Compared to JD, Egnyte has the following benefits.Ībility to setup file/folder level permissions So like $1,320 / month.Ĭurrently, I am using Jungle Disk for the past 3-4 years and have plenty of problems with that. So, if you wanted the same service from Nasuni as from my example above, I could do the same thing, around $320/mo for hosting the Nasuni filer in a Tier 1 datacenter and then the $12K for Nasuni itself on top of that. It's just that it backs your own datacenter to Rackspace or Amazon. Oh, Nasuni is not an online filer, though, you still have to virtualize it in your own datacenter. But if you need the flexibility of a full filer, why not have a full filer at a fraction of the cost of a virtualized online one? ![]() I'm just guessing at that number, but I could have someone run the figures and get a quote for you if you wanted. ![]() I could probably do this for you for ~$300/mo including up to 1TB of data transfer per month and 6+ TB of usable storage capacity. But they can certainly meet your needs.įor a fraction of that price you could get a rackmount storage device and colocate it in a Tier 1 datacenter. It's a different market that they work on today than when you saw them in the community here. So instead of pennies per GB, they are now quite expensive. ![]() They have switched from focusing on being an online file server company to being a highly protected data backup company using an online file server. Nasuni will certainly have what you need but starts at $12,000 per year for a single TB of storage. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |